My girlfriend and I put up with the crowds to spend a spring-like January afternoon hiking up Rattlesnake Ledge, one of the Seattle area’s best-known day hikes. The trail was a delightful conga line with cute dogs and so many babies riding in backpacks. We got an amazing view of Seattle’s water reservoir when we made it to the top and braved the strong winds clearing the clouds from the skies. Chester Morse Lake was dammed in 1901 to enhance the storage capacity of the pre-existing Cedar Lake as a water and power source. Seattle City Light constructed the Masonry Dam a mile downstream from the original dam in 1914 to try to increase both supplies. All 250 square miles of the Cedar River watershed is now off-limits to hikers, paddlers, and industry as its protected water is piped down to thirsty metropolitan King County.

Another lake comes into view if you shift your gaze from the eastern horizon to directly below Rattlesnake Ledge. Rattlesnake Lake is a puddle compared to its majestic neighbor. It’s 600 feet lower in elevation and one mile northwest of Chester Morse Lake. Tree stumps march down its gently sloping gravel beach into the lake. It looks like a normal small lake in the Cascades until you start to look at small details. The beach and some of the trees sport “bathtub rings” of high-water marks. The tree stumps bear tell-tale scars of axes, even when their roots are submerged. The trees were evidently cut before the lake was filled. So what filled the lake?

It turns out that the answer is a tale of dueling glaciers, growing cities, and engineers and geologists who made a big mistake in their design process.

Chester Morse Lake is an “upgrade” to the original Cedar Lake that existed naturally in this valley since the last ice age. Why was there a lake here in the first place? You’ll have to be patient and wait for the geology section. Workers from the City of Seattle constructed a timber-crib dam half a mile below the natural outlet of Cedar Lake in 1901 to enhance its storage capacity and increase the pressure head for hydroelectric power production. This dam allowed the water level to be elevated by 18 feet (to elevation 1,548) and provided 25,000 acre-feet of additional storage. This is enough for about 5,000 modern households, and a sizeable jump from the 33,500 acre-feet of storage that Cedar Lake originally contained.
Water from behind this dam was piped down to a powerhouse at Cedar Falls on its way to the city’s taps, and this clean energy first lit up Seattle in 1905. The town of Moncton was built on the shores of a much smaller Rattlesnake Lake to house folks who worked for the utility. Most workers lived in the railway terminus of Cedar Falls, but a few decided to build a quiet new community half a mile up the road in Moncton starting in 1906. By 1915 more than 200 people lived in Moncton and enjoyed amenities such as a kindergarten to 8th grade school, a hotel, barbershops, a saloon, restaurants, and stores (HistoryLink Essay 2436).
In 1910, Seattle City Light was flush with success from the first dam and decided to build a second to raise the water level even higher. They decided that this new dam should be built in a narrow bedrock valley 1.5 miles downriver from the original timber-crib dam. This dam was made of concrete instead of timber and earth, so it was given the creative name “Masonry Dam”. This dam was designed to have a spillway crest at an elevation of 1,605 feet (over 50 feet higher than the timber crib dam) and was meant to provide an ambitious total storage capacity of 125,000 square feet.
Check out the map below to see the context of the hiking trail, Rattlesnake Lake, and the two dams.
The geology of the area started to undermine this goal as soon as construction started. Due the seepage from the pool through the banks, the spillway crest was lowered to 1,590 feet and an “escape hatch” was built in at 1,555 feet. This modern edifice was finished in December 1914, at which time water started filling the new “Masonry Pool”. (USGS, Hadaka 1967) The project’s engineers figured that if they raised the water level slowly enough, natural silt deposition would seal up the leaks.
At the end of the first leak test the loss by seepage was calculated to be 30,000,000 gallons per day – 45 Olympic swimming pools per day. This is “success” defined extremely loosely.
This new raising of the water level of Chester Morse Lake doomed Moncton. Springs squirted out of ground all around town in spring 1915. The lake was rising at a rate of a foot per day by May 1915 – by the end of the month, the lake had risen 13 feet. By December 1915 the town was officially condemned. No people had been injured in this slow-moving disaster, but they lost their homes.
To staunch the seepage, Masonry Pool was drained and the banks were lined with clay and other fine-grained sediment in stages between 1915 and 1918. In December 1918 the engineers figured out they had plugged all the major leaks and allowed heavy rains to fill Masonry Pool to an elevation of 1,550 feet. The seepage rate averaged 323,000,000 gallons per day – an order of magnitude higher than 1915 – even after all the work to line the reservoir with clay. This triggered another hydraulic catastrophe that I’ll cover in a later post when I’ve hiked to that site. The original lofty goal of quadrupling Cedar Lake’s natural storage through the marvels of modern engineering was definitely dead by this point.
So what was it that stymied the engineers and dreamers? They planned the dams like they were building on solid bedrock when instead they were messing with a natural type of earthen dam called a glacial moraine, put in place 17,000 years ago by an immense ice sheet 3,300 feet thick. Glacial moraines are made of whatever a glacier can bulldoze out in front of it – clay, boulders, gravel, and sand all jumbled up and shoved into place (till)- as well as better-sorted sand and gravel washed out by meltwater from beneath the glacier (outwash material). The side of the moraine facing away from the glacier is made up of outwash material, and the material on the glacier side is made of a thinner layer of till here. But at the end of the day it’s just a nice big pile of dirt.
In the annotated photo below, the moraine is everything between the two orange areas labeled “Andesite Bedrock”. The crest of the moraine is drawn in red.

If you were to draw a line straight down the middle of that photo, exaggerate the vertical scale, cartoon in some geology, and project the profile of the Cedar River a couple hundred yards to the north, you’d get the diagram below:

So we’ve got a glacier piling up a bunch of dirt with its immense bulk, like a bow wave of a hippo plunging into a mud puddle in extreme slow motion. If you were asked what direction this glacier came from, that creates a moraine in the foothills of a very pleasant mountain range with ski resorts, what do you think the obvious answer would be? Down from the crest of the Cascade Mountains? The Cedar Lake/Rattlesnake Lake area forces us to look instead at a much bigger player in the region that crept up from the lowlands – the Puget Sound lobe of the immense Cordilleran Ice Sheet. This behemoth of ice stretched all the way from Alaska in the north through British Columbia to just past Olympia at its southern extent. Glaciologists estimate that the ice sheet was 1.6 kilometers thick at the USA/Canada border, and 1 kilometer thick over Seattle.
With so much mass behind it, this ice sheet had no problem pushing up the Snoqualmie lowlands as far as the triple junction of the Middle Fork Snoqualmie, South Fork Snoqualmie, and Cedar Valleys. The ice sheet left huge moraines at the foot of these three valleys. The upper areas of the Cedar Lake watershed are made of granite, but no granite can be found in the moraine material damming its mouth. Instead, the rocks in the moraine match those at the glacially-scoured based of Mt. Si several miles downriver, as do the huge benches of glacial material at the mouths of the Middle Fork and South Fork Snoqualmie Rivers.
In fact, the Puget Lobe of the ice sheet blocked off the Middle Fork, South Fork, and Cedar Rivers entirely, creating lakes upstream of the ice sheet. Material was deposited both from the glacial scour under the ice sheet (a wild mix of grain sizes from silt to boulders) and to a lesser extent from the material from higher in the Cascades (which settled into the lake in layers of fine sand and silt). These three “finger” lakes were connected by meandering streams that flowed from the Middle Fork Lake to the South Fork Lake to the Cedar Lake and finally out to the south through what is now the Cedar River. When the ice sheet retreated, the Middle Fork Snoqualmie and South Fork Snoqualmie rivers eroded through their glacial moraines but the Cedar River was stuck in its ways and stayed flowing to the south around Rattlesnake Ridge. The intact moraine in the Cedar Valley impounded Cedar Lake – the only one of the original 3 glacial lakes to survive to the present.

This last bit is important – when it was trapped by the ice sheet, the Cedar River was forced to flow through the hard bedrock instead of the softer glacial sediment. Nerds call this an “entrenched river”. The Cedar Valley’s glacial moraine stayed intact after the ice sheet receded, unlike the Middle and South Fork Snoqualmie where the streams incised through the moraines as soon as they could. At Cedar Lake, the retreated glacier left behind a moraine that sloped steeply down to Rattlesnake Lake but very gradually down to Cedar Lake. This is an unusual presentation for a glacial lake in this area. Most glacial lakes in the Cascades are created from alpine glaciers flowing down from the high peaks, and the moraine slopes gradually in the downstream direction. Stepping into the shoes of the 1910s engineers who planned the dam, they likely did not recognize this landscape as a glacial moraine and instead believed that the Cedar River eroded into its current channel as the usual path of least resistance. This misconception would have suggested that the shortcut to Rattlesnake Lake was not a preferential pathway for groundwater flow.
The map below gives a birds-eye view of the Cedar Valley. North is to the right of the picture. Brown color indicates bedrock, medium blue indicates streams and rivers, light grey indicates the moraine. Note that the blue Cedar River is flowing through bedrock. Red lines indicate topographic surface slope on the moraine… and groundwater flow direction. There’s a treacherous gap highlighted in a blue oval between the Masonry Dam and the crest of the moraine…

This may have confused the engineers who designed the dams at Cedar Lake. The issue is that glacial moraine material holds water like a sponge. It’s better than a sandcastle wall holding back the tide at the beach, thanks to some clay content, but not by much. Gravity kept the Cedar River in its embedded bedrock gorge that was carved during the last ice age only as long as the river was at its natural height. Gravity and water pressure quickly found a shortcut when the dam forced the water level to rise in the Masonry Pool: straight west through the moraine to Rattlesnake Lake. When water is held back behind a moraine at a certain elevation, like at the OG Cedar River, the water table drops down through moraine at a certain curve. When the water table is raised vertically with a dam, the toe of that curve pops out horizontally. In the case of Moncton, the toe of the curve looked like those springs that showed up under their town.
Since 1915, the engineering dreams for Masonry Dam have faded away. The original Timber Crib dam is still the primary detention for Chester Morse reservoir at elevation 1546 feet. The Masonry Dam only holds additional water at the peak of the wet season when input into Masonry Pool exceeds the monumental outflow from the elevated reservoir into the moraine. Masonry Pool rise to elevation 1561 feet when snowmelt is at its greatest in the spring. By the 1940s Seattle City Light had moved to draw most of its power from a plant on the Skagit River, leaving Chester Morse’s powerplant as an afterthought.
The houses of Moncton drowned so engineers and geologists could learn more about how to prevent these disasters in the future. However, it would have to be the future after 1918… I’ll hike to that disaster site later this month.
RESOURCES
I got WAY into the weeds researching this slow-motion dam failure and most of it didn’t end up in this post for the sake of clarity. Much of this post is based on work by J. Hoover Mackin who proposed the ice sheet situation and analyzed the dam failure in the early 1940s. I highly recommend his paper “Glacial geology of the Snoqualmie-Cedar Area, Washington” which is available on JSTOR, and his booklet “A Geologic Interpretation of the Failure of the Cedar Reservoir, Washington”. I learned a good bit about historical CYA techniques. The engineering reports switched from reporting flow in gallons per day in 1915 into cubic feet per second in 1918. 500 cfs sure sounds a lot better than 323,150,000 gallons per day.
- Chester Morse Dam construction photos: https://archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:80444/xv99850
- Journalist visit to Chester Morse Dam: https://www.invw.org/2015/09/09/visiting-seattles-off-limits-watershed-to-learn-about-climate-change/
- Snoqualmie Valley Museum: https://snoqualmievalleymuseum.pastperfectonline.com/photo/63DC26FB-17E6-413C-8086-820267087801
- Blog post on the slow drowning of Moncton: https://ghosttownsofwashington.blogspot.com/2011/07/missing-town-of-moncton.html
- HistoryLink on Chester Morse Dam: https://www.historylink.org/File/2486
- USGS paper on groundwater seepage from Chester Morse Dam: https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/1839j/report.pdf
- Seattle Times article from 1963 about the building of the dams: https://blackdiamondhistory.wordpress.com/2017/11/10/cedar-river-it-may-be-short-but-it-is-vital/
- Boxley blowout: https://www.historylink.org/File/2426
- LiDAR survey of Cedar River Watershed: http://pugetsoundlidar.ess.washington.edu/lidardata/restricted/projects/2014cedarriver.html
- https://www.historylink.org/File/2436 Flooding of Moncton